Gardens 互动工作室三年未定发售日融资超 7000 万 为何仍获投资者下注
Three Years, $70M, No Release Date: Why Investors Keep Betting on Gardens
Gardens 互动工作室获 Lightspeed 领投的 B 轮超 3500 万美元,总融资破 7000 万估值 1.9 亿,但三年未公布发售日。联合创始人解释晚期从 Unity 转 Unreal 等技术转折,并定义游戏为在线生存角色扮演“strandbox”且永不付费取胜。前 Valve 经济学家参与变现设计,资方看好 AI 时代的人际连接价值。
原文基于播客梳理 Gardens 互动工作室三年未公布发售日却累计融资超 7000 万美元的背景,反映传统风投对社交生存品类的集中下注。
Three years after raising a $31.3M Series A off a prototype shown behind closed doors at GDC, Gardens Interactive still hasn’t announced a release date. Investors just put in another $35M+ anyway. In this episode, Kalie Moore welcomes back Stephen Bell and Chris Bell, two of Gardens’ three co-founders and the team behind Journey, Sky, What Remains of Edith Finch and Blaseball, following a Series B led by Lightspeed that values the studio at $190M and brings total funding past $70M before launch. They explain what took three years, including a late switch from Unity to Unreal, how Chris handed the CEO role to Stephen to focus fully on the game, and what Gardens actually is now that it can speak for itself: an online survival roleplaying “strandbox” where players cross paths with strangers, build relationships, and reshape the world together. Stephen pushes back on the friendslop label and the idea that jank is a weakness, and Chris shares how a single image in an inspiration folder led to a cold DM to Ma-ko, the artist whose work now defines the game’s look.
The conversation also gets into the money. Stephen explains why the round leaned on traditional VCs rather than gaming funds, what separates Gardens from the wave of veteran-led studios that raised big in the zero interest rate era without breaking out, and why the reported “one year of runway after release” doesn’t tell the full story. He’s candid that this isn’t a funding recovery so much as a concentration, and why he thinks games are now underfunded rather than overfunded. They also cover how Lightspeed sees human connection as a bet that gets more valuable as AI spreads, why their proprietary tech blends procedural generation with hand-authored content, how they measure success in playtests by the stories and relationships players report, and how they’re approaching monetization with former Valve economist Mike Ambinder, starting with one firm rule: Gardens will never be pay to win.
We’d also like to thank Tebex for making this episode possible! With funding tight, the question isn’t just how big a game can get but how long a studio can run, and that starts with knowing what each sale actually returns. Tebex’s free Hidden Fees Calculator compares your provider’s headline rate with your true effective rate, including FX, payment method and chargeback costs, and shows the annual difference. Check it out here and learn more about Tebex at https://www.tebex.io/.

The post Three Years, $70M, No Release Date: Why Investors Keep Betting on Gardens appeared first on Naavik.
来源:Naavik · naavik.co